Quantcast
Channel: Collections Latest Topics
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1374

Complaint received in Ohio, very confused

$
0
0

Received this complaint on Friday 12/29/2017.  I am very confused on how to answer a majority of it, should I answer each number 1-10 or just answer a general denial?  Also I am reading about demanding an Arbitration with JAMS, not sure how to even go this route....so confused but willing to learn in order to do this correctly.  Any help would be so appreciated. 

 

 

1. Plaintiff, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC DOING BUSINESS IN OHIO AS MIDLAND FUNDING DE LLC ("Plaintiff") is a limited liability company qualified to do business in Ohio.

2. This court is the proper court because Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant, MY NAME, (hereafter "Defendant"), residence lies within the jurisdiction of this Court.

FACTS

3. Defendant opened an account with SYNCHRONY BANK or its predecessor in interest. A copy of the account statement is attached as Exhibit "A".

4. Plaintiff has purchase Defendant's debt, and is entitled to all rights as owner thereof.

MIDLANDS EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE UNDERLYING OBLIGATION

5. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC DOING BUSINESS IN OHIO AS MIDLAND FUNDING DE LLC owns portfolios of consumer receivables, which attempts to collect. When working with individual consumers, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC DOING BUSINESS IN OHIO AS MIDLAND FUNDING DE LLC and its affiliates (collectively, "Midland") generally attempt to contact consumers like Defendant through several means, all in an effort to establish contact and to resolve the underlying obligation. In doing so, Midland attempts to assess each consumer's willingness to pay, through phone calls, letters or other means. Midland attempts to exclude consumers from its collection efforts, where Midland believes those consumers are facing extenuating circumstances or hardships that would prevent them from making any payments.

6. When Midland contacts consumers, it strives to treat consumers with respect, compassion and integrity. Midland works with consumers in an effort to find mutually-beneficial solutions, often offering discounts, hardship plans, and payment options. Midland's efforts are aimed at working with the consumers to repay their obligations and to attain financial recovery. Midland strives to engage in dialogue that is honorable and constructive, and to play a positive role in consumers' lives.

7. Despite Midland's efforts to reach consumers and resolve the consumer's obligations, only a percentage of consumers choose to engage with Midland. Those who do are often offered discounts or payment plans that are intended to suit their needs. Midland would prefer to work with consumers to establish voluntary payment arrangements resulting in the resolution of any underlying obligations.

8. However, the majority of Midland's consumers ignore calls or letters, and some simply refuse to repay their obligations despite an apparent ability to do so. When this happens Midland must decide then whether to pursue collection through legal channels, including litigation like the present action against the Defendant. Although the account is no in litigation, Plaintiff remains willing to explore a mutually-beneficial solution through voluntary payment arrangements, if possible.

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

9. There is now due and owing from the Defendant, in the amount of $1122.95.

10. Plaintiff has made demand on Defendant for repayment of the account but Defendant has failed and refused to pay the balance due.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment agains Defendant as follows:

a) For the unpaid balance of $1122.95, and

b)Interest at the statutory rate, per annum, from the date of judgement, and, 

c) Costs for suit, and

d) Such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1374

Trending Articles